In partnership with
Retirement Planning Made Easy
Building a retirement plan can be tricky— with so many considerations it’s hard to know where to start. That’s why we’ve put together The 15-Minute Retirement Plan to help investors with $1 million+ create a path forward and navigate important financial decisions in retirement.
🚀 Your Investing Journey Just Got Better: Premium Subscriptions Are Here! 🚀
It’s been 4 months since we launched our premium subscription plans at GuruFinance Insights, and the results have been phenomenal! Now, we’re making it even better for you to take your investing game to the next level. Whether you’re just starting out or you’re a seasoned trader, our updated plans are designed to give you the tools, insights, and support you need to succeed.
Here’s what you’ll get as a premium member:
Exclusive Trading Strategies: Unlock proven methods to maximize your returns.
In-Depth Research Analysis: Stay ahead with insights from the latest market trends.
Ad-Free Experience: Focus on what matters most—your investments.
Monthly AMA Sessions: Get your questions answered by top industry experts.
Coding Tutorials: Learn how to automate your trading strategies like a pro.
Masterclasses & One-on-One Consultations: Elevate your skills with personalized guidance.
Our three tailored plans—Starter Investor, Pro Trader, and Elite Investor—are designed to fit your unique needs and goals. Whether you’re looking for foundational tools or advanced strategies, we’ve got you covered.
Don’t wait any longer to transform your investment strategy. The last 4 months have shown just how powerful these tools can be—now it’s your turn to experience the difference.
How Gaussian Mixture Models and technical analysis create an adaptive trading strategy
Markets don’t move in straight lines. They breathe, cycling through periods of calm growth, choppy consolidation, and violent corrections. Professional investors know this intuitively — the question is: can we systematize it?
In this article, I’ll show you how to build a regime detection system using Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM) that dynamically shifts between aggressive growth positioning and capital preservation based on real-time market conditions. No crystal balls, no predictions — just adaptive risk management.
Kickstart your holiday campaigns
CTV should be central to any growth marketer’s Q4 strategy. And with Roku Ads Manager, launching high-performing holiday campaigns is simple and effective.
With our intuitive interface, you can set up A/B tests to dial in the most effective messages and offers, then drive direct on-screen purchases via the remote with shoppable Action Ads that integrate with your Shopify store for a seamless checkout experience.
Don’t wait to get started. Streaming on Roku picks up sharply in early October. By launching your campaign now, you can capture early shopping demand and be top of mind as the seasonal spirit kicks in.
Get a $500 ad credit when you spend your first $500 today with code: ROKUADS500. Terms apply.
The Core Problem: Static Allocation in Dynamic Markets
The S&P 500 has delivered ~10% annualized returns over the long term. But that average masks enormous volatility:
2020–2021: Explosive 40%+ returns
2022: Devastating -25% drawdown
2023–2024: Strong recovery +25%
2025: Continued growth
A static 60/40 portfolio misses opportunities during bull runs and suffers unnecessarily during crashes. Leveraged buy-and-hold (like 3x S&P 500) amplifies both extremes, delivering exceptional returns but catastrophic drawdowns of 70–80%.
The insight: If we could identify when markets are in “low risk / high momentum” mode versus “high risk / uncertain direction” mode, we could adjust our exposure accordingly.
The Solution: Three Distinct Market Regimes
Our system identifies three market states:
Bullish Regime (60–70% of the time)
Characteristics: Low volatility, strong directional momentum, consistent closes near daily highs
Position: 100% UPRO (3x leveraged S&P 500)
Full risk-on exposure with diversified 500-stock index
Captures explosive upside during favorable conditions
S&P 500 provides better diversification than tech-only indices
Neutral Regime (20–25% of the time)
Characteristics: Moderate volatility, choppy price action, uncertainty
Position: 75% SHY (1–3 Year Treasuries) + 25% GLD (Gold)
Capital preservation becomes priority
Treasuries provide safety and liquidity
Gold offers uncorrelated returns and inflation protection
Crash Regime (5–15% of the time)
Characteristics: High volatility, large intraday ranges, market stress
Position: 75% SHY (1–3 Year Treasuries) + 25% GLD (Gold)
Same as neutral — maximum capital protection
No short positions (inverse ETFs have tracking issues)
Focus on not losing money rather than making it
Technical Foundation: Three Critical Features
To detect regimes, we need indicators that capture different dimensions of market behavior. I selected three complementary features:
1. Average True Range (ATR) — Absolute Volatility
ATR measures how much the market moves on average, regardless of direction:
def calculate_atr(df, period=14):
# True Range accounts for gaps and intraday movement
high_low = high - low
high_close = abs(high - previous_close)
low_close = abs(low - previous_close)
true_range = max(high_low, high_close, low_close)
atr = true_range.rolling(period).mean()
return atr.shift(1) # Avoid look-ahead biasWhy it matters: High ATR signals market stress. Low ATR indicates calm conditions favorable for leverage.
Want the full code snippet to implement this yourself? Upgrade to our paid subscription for exclusive access—it's waiting for you at the end of this article!
2. Internal Bar Strength (IBS) — Momentum & Mean Reversion
IBS = (Close — Low) / (High — Low)
This normalized ratio (0 to 1) reveals where the close sits within the day’s range:
IBS near 1.0: Closes near high (bullish momentum)
IBS near 0.0: Closes near low (bearish pressure)
IBS near 0.5: Choppy, indecisive action
def calculate_ibs(df):
range_val = high - low
ibs = (close - low) / range_val
return ibs.shift(1) # Avoid look-ahead biasWhy it matters: Bullish regimes show consistently high IBS. Crash regimes show extreme oscillations.
3. Yang-Zhang Volatility — Comprehensive Risk Measure
Unlike simple standard deviation, Yang-Zhang volatility combines:
Overnight volatility (close-to-open gaps)
Intraday volatility (high-low movement)
Open-to-close volatility (directional component)
def calculate_yang_zhang_vol(df, window=20):
overnight_vol = variance(log(open / previous_close))
intraday_vol = variance(log(close / open))
# Rogers-Satchell component
rs_vol = mean((log(high/open) * log(high/close)) +
(log(low/open) * log(low/close)))
# Yang-Zhang formula with optimal k factor
k = 0.34 / (1.34 + (window + 1) / (window - 1))
yz_vol = sqrt(overnight_vol + k * intraday_vol + (1-k) * rs_vol)
# Annualize and shift
return yz_vol * sqrt(252).shift(1)Why it matters: Most sophisticated volatility estimator. Captures different types of market risk that simple volatility misses.
Together, these three features create a 3D view of market conditions:
ATR = magnitude of movement
IBS = direction and strength
YZ Vol = comprehensive risk assessment
The Model: Gaussian Mixture Models
With three features calculated, we need a way to automatically cluster market conditions into regimes. Enter Gaussian Mixture Models.
What is GMM?
GMM assumes the market has multiple underlying “states,” each following a normal distribution. The model learns:
The mean and covariance of each regime (what’s “typical” in each state)
The probability of being in each regime at any time
Unlike hard clustering (K-means), GMM gives us soft assignments — probability distributions rather than binary labels. This is crucial for risk management.
100 Genius Side Hustle Ideas
Don't wait. Sign up for The Hustle to unlock our side hustle database. Unlike generic "start a blog" advice, we've curated 100 actual business ideas with real earning potential, startup costs, and time requirements. Join 1.5M professionals getting smarter about business daily and launch your next money-making venture.
Implementation
from sklearn.mixture import GaussianMixture
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler# Normalize features (critical for GMM)
scaler = StandardScaler()
X = scaler.fit_transform(features[['atr', 'ibs', 'yz_vol']])# Train GMM with 3 components
gmm = GaussianMixture(
n_components=3,
covariance_type='full', # Allow feature correlations
random_state=42,
max_iter=200,
n_init=10 # Multiple initializations for robustness
)gmm.fit(X)
regimes = gmm.predict(X)
probabilities = gmm.predict_proba(X)Automatic Regime Identification
GMM assigns arbitrary labels (0, 1, 2). We identify which is which by analyzing statistics:
def identify_regimes(features, regimes):
stats = features.groupby('regime').agg({
'atr': 'mean',
'ibs': 'mean',
'yz_vol': 'mean'
})
# Crash = highest volatility
crash_regime = stats['yz_vol'].idxmax()
# Bullish = lowest volatility + highest IBS
remaining = stats.drop(crash_regime)
bullish_regime = remaining['ibs'].idxmax()
# Neutral = remaining
neutral_regime = the_other_one
return {'bullish': bullish_regime,
'neutral': neutral_regime,
'crash': crash_regime}This is completely data-driven — no manual labeling required.
Critical: Avoiding Look-Ahead Bias
Look-ahead bias destroys backtests. It occurs when your model uses information that wouldn’t have been available at the time of trading.
The Timeline
Here’s the correct flow of information:
Day T-1 EOD: Calculate features using data through T-1
↓
Day T Open: Predict regime, execute trades at market open
↓
Day T EOD: Measure returns (open[T] / open[T-1] - 1)Implementation
Every feature calculation includes .shift(1):
# For time T, features use data through T-1
atr = calculate_true_range().rolling(14).mean().shift(1)
ibs = calculate_ibs().shift(1)
yz_vol = calculate_yang_zhang().shift(1)When we predict regime for day T, the GMM sees features calculated with data through T-1. We can then trade at open of T with confidence we’re not cheating.
Returns Calculation
We use open-to-open returns:
returns = open[t] / open[t-1] - 1This reflects realistic execution: you see the regime signal before market open and execute at the open price.
Execution: Bi-Weekly Rebalancing
While we could rebalance daily, this creates two problems:
Excessive transaction costs from 250+ trades per year
Noise amplification from reacting to daily regime fluctuations
Instead, we rebalance every 14 days (bi-weekly):
REBALANCE_FREQUENCY = 14 # Every 2 weeks# Only change positions on rebalancing days
for day in trading_days:
if day % 14 == 0:
# Rebalancing day - update positions based on regime
if regime == bullish:
position = 100% UPRO
else:
position = 75% SHY + 25% GLD
else:
# Keep previous positions
position = previous_position
# Calculate daily returns with current position
strategy_return = position * asset_returnsThis gives us:
~18 rebalancing events per year (252 / 14)
Responsive enough to capture regime changes
Low enough frequency to minimize costs
Institutional-grade execution pattern
Portfolio Construction: Why These Specific Assets?
Aggressive Position: UPRO (3x S&P 500)
Why 3x leverage?
Maximizes upside capture during favorable regimes
Only deployed when conditions are optimal (low vol, high momentum)
Why S&P 500 over NASDAQ?
Diversification: 500 companies vs ~100
Sector balance: Includes utilities, healthcare, consumer staples (defensive sectors)
Lower volatility: Tech concentration adds unnecessary risk
Better representation: Tracks overall economy, not just tech
Risk acknowledgment:
UPRO can lose value quickly (daily rebalancing friction)
Not suitable for buy-and-hold
Only appropriate when regime detection is confident
Defensive Position: 75% SHY + 25% GLD
Why 75% Treasuries?
Ultimate safe haven: 1–3 year treasuries are highly liquid and stable
Capital preservation: Objective is not to lose money
Low correlation: Treasuries often rise when stocks fall
No tracking errors: Unlike inverse ETFs, treasuries are straightforward
Why 25% Gold?
Inflation hedge: Protects purchasing power
Crisis alpha: Gold often rises during market turmoil
Uncorrelated returns: Different drivers than both stocks and bonds
Portfolio stabilizer: Reduces overall volatility
Why NO short positions?
Inverse ETFs (like SH) suffer from tracking errors
Don’t always rise when markets fall
Contango decay in futures-based products
Simpler = more reliable
The 75/25 split:
Prioritizes capital preservation (75% in safest asset)
Maintains some growth/hedge potential (25% in gold)
Maximum simplicity and reliability
Implementation Considerations
Transaction Costs
With ~18 trades per year:
At 0.1% round-trip cost: ~1.8% annual drag
At 0.05% round-trip cost: ~0.9% annual drag
Still leaves substantial alpha versus benchmarks
Slippage
UPRO, SHY, and GLD are highly liquid:
Tight bid-ask spreads
Deep order books
Minimal market impact for retail size
Tax Efficiency
Frequent rebalancing triggers short-term capital gains:
Consider implementing in tax-advantaged accounts (IRA, 401k)
Or adjust rebalancing frequency for taxable accounts
Regime Stability
Analysis shows regimes are persistent:
Average regime duration: 3–6 weeks
Not flipping daily (which would indicate overfitting)
Captures structural market shifts
Potential Extensions
1. Volatility Targeting Scale leverage based on realized volatility:
When vol is extra low: 4x exposure
When vol rises: reduce to 2x
Maintains consistent risk across regimes
2. Additional Features
VIX (fear gauge)
Put/call ratio (sentiment)
Yield curve slope (recession indicator)
Credit spreads (systemic risk)
3. Multiple Regime Counts Use BIC/AIC to optimize number of regimes:
2 regimes: Simple bull/bear
3 regimes: Bull/neutral/bear (current)
4 regimes: Strong bull / weak bull / neutral / bear
5+ regimes: May overfit
4. Hidden Markov Models Add transition probabilities:
Predict regime changes before they happen
Smooth transitions using probability thresholds
More sophisticated but more complex
5. Position Sizing by Confidence Use regime probabilities to scale exposure:
90%+ probability bullish: 100% UPRO
70–90% probability bullish: 75% UPRO
50–70% probability bullish: 50% UPRO
<50% probability bullish: defensive
6. Multi-Asset Defensive Portfolio Expand beyond treasuries and gold:
Commodities (DBC)
International bonds (BNDX)
TIPS (inflation-protected securities)
Cash equivalents (SHV)
Conclusion: Systematic Risk Management
This GMM-based regime detection system demonstrates that machine learning can effectively navigate market cycles when combined with sound financial principles.
The Philosophy:
This isn’t about predicting the future. It’s about adapting to the present. When markets show low volatility, strong momentum, and healthy price action, we take calculated risks with 3x leverage. When volatility spikes, momentum breaks, or price action deteriorates, we prioritize capital preservation.
That adaptability — having an “appetite for risk” that expands and contracts with market conditions — is what gives this systematic approach an edge over static allocations.
Performance Summary:
================================================================================
PERFORMANCE METRICS
================================================================================
Total Return.................. 173.01%
Annualized Return............. 22.62%
Volatility.................... 26.17%
Sharpe Ratio.................. 0.86
Max Drawdown.................. -29.52%
Calmar Ratio.................. 0.77
Win Rate...................... 54.47%
Total Days.................... 1241
Rebalancing Events............ 16
Avg Trades/Year............... 3.2
---........................... ---
QQQ Total Return.............. 112.97%
QQQ Annualized................ 16.59%
QQQ Volatility................ 22.96%
QQQ Sharpe.................... 0.72
QQQ Max DD.................... -37.09%
----.......................... ----
UPRO Total Return............. 270.00%
UPRO Annualized............... 30.43%
UPRO Volatility............... 52.55%
UPRO Sharpe................... 0.58
UPRO Max DD................... -66.56%The Real Value:
Markets will always surprise us. No model is perfect. But a systematic framework for identifying when to be aggressive versus defensive — backed by machine learning, grounded in technical analysis, and executed with discipline — gives us the best chance of surviving crashes and thriving during bulls.
Build it. Test it. Improve it. Question every assumption. And remember: this is risk management, not a crystal ball.
Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The strategies discussed involve significant risk. Leveraged ETFs like UPRO can lose substantial value quickly. Treasury bonds and gold are not risk-free. Do your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before implementing any trading strategy.
There you have it—the complete guide. For paid subscribers only: Scroll down to grab the full, ready-to-run code snippet. Not subscribed yet? Join now and unlock all our premium content, including this one. Your projects deserve the best tools—let's level up together!
Subscribe to our premium content to get the full code snippet.
Become a paying subscriber to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.
Upgrade